Not long ago I had something like seven people coming over, and decided to make risotto. It seemed inhospitable to give them only one grain, so I quickly came up with the idea of two grains. But that had no balance whatsoever--I could see the piles of rice split into two on the plate, staring at each other with untempered boredom. Obviously this would make the guests do the same with each other. What a dumb, binary thing to bring into the world, two risotti! So before I knew it, I had arrived upon the idea of a triumvirate, as so:
Instance #1: asparagus, portobello, romano & pine nut
Instance #2: saffron, banana pepper, romano & lemon
Instance #3: marscapone, romano & apple
So of course you are thinking this was a very bad idea for the health of my arms, because everyone knows that risotto involves moving that shit around in a pot for an hour with a brutal spoon. You know who doesn't know that?
Mark Bittman and Mario Batali. And now--after four years of obsessive and asocial spoon waggling--I know it. In fact, cooking three risotti is perhaps the best way to ween oneself off the useless stirring habit because it's virtually impossible to get them all going round at once. This frees up appendages for wine drinking and high-fiving.
Of the instances, there was no consensus on which one was best. Many people loved #1, most appreciated #3, and I remain dedicated to the idea of #2, a ditty picked up from
here.